Book a call →
LinkedIn creates the demand. Google harvests it. Do only one of the two and you are either paying for attention that evaporates or waiting for demand that never forms.
There is a reflex in B2B marketing that costs money: putting the entire budget into the channel that produces measurable leads fastest.
Usually that is Google. Someone searches for “CRM software comparison”, clicks the ad, fills in the form — done, conversion. Cleanly attributable, visible in the report immediately. What could be wrong with that?
The answer comes from one of the most important findings of recent years — the 95-5 rule, developed by LinkedIn's B2B Institute together with the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute. It says that at any given moment only around five per cent of potential B2B buyers are actually in market, that is, ready to buy. The other 95 per cent don't need anything right now — they have a contract, other priorities, no acute problem.
Only five per cent of your future customers are ready to buy today. Target them alone and you are fighting the entire competition over the same tiny slice.
That is the core of the problem. Bet on Google alone and you compete with everyone else for the same five per cent — in an auction system where more than 80 per cent of providers bid for the same leads and click prices have been rising for years. You harvest what is there, but you never sow. And when the 95 per cent eventually enter the market, they don't know your brand — by then it is too late.
Google Ads and LinkedIn Ads are not competitors for the same budget but two tools for two entirely different states of the buyer.
Google works with intent-based targeting. You reach people in the moment of active search, with concrete intent — harvesting demand that already exists. No surprise that, according to industry data, around two thirds of first touchpoints in B2B run through a Google search. People with a problem google it.
LinkedIn works with attribute-based targeting. Here you reach people not by search term but by job title, seniority, industry, company size — by who they are, not by what they happen to be typing. You anchor the brand in their mind before the need arises, so that it is present when it does.
Put together, the two make a seamless journey through the buying process — and in B2B that process is long. Decision-makers typically pass through six to eight touchpoints before they buy, and a B2B decision usually involves several people. A single click on a Google ad never captures that.
With content that informs rather than sells — white papers, webinars, short thought-leader videos, infographics. You build interest and credibility long before anyone fills in a form. Push “book a demo” at this stage and you have misread the medium.
Anyone who engaged with the LinkedIn content or visited the website lands in retargeting pools. Google picks exactly those people up again — at the moment they are actively looking for a solution. The demand LinkedIn sowed is harvested by Google.
The real leverage sits not in either channel but in the handover between them.
In practice that means retargeting sequences built around maturity. Education at the top, social proof and case studies in the middle, a clear call to action at the bottom. Existing customers and open opportunities are excluded so no budget burns on impressions that lead nowhere. And because creative fatigue sets in, the assets get rotated regularly.
The platforms keep evolving; the underlying principle stays. On LinkedIn, thought-leader ads are among the most efficient formats in 2026 because they humanise a brand and feel more organic than classic ads — ideal for the upper funnel. New optimisation logics such as qualified lead optimisation sharpen delivery towards genuinely relevant leads instead of merely counting forms. Short-form video is becoming standard.
What does not change is the need for clean measurement. The LinkedIn Insight Tag and consistent conversion tracking across both platforms are the precondition for the algorithm to learn and for you to see each channel's contribution at all. Without that foundation, cross-channel stays a gut feeling rather than a strategy.
A realistic start needs no vast budget. A three-phase approach works well: first test both platforms in parallel with the same budget and an identical conversion goal; then shift budget towards the stronger channel based on the data; finally integrate both firmly into a customer journey strategy with clear, channel-specific roles.
Google Ads and LinkedIn Ads are not an either-or but a yin and yang.
LinkedIn builds the brand in the minds of future buyers; Google turns that interest into measurable results once the need becomes acute. One without the other is either reach without harvest or harvest without sowing.
Companies that only skim off existing demand end up sooner or later in a price war over the same few buyers who are ready. Companies that also create demand build a brand lead competitors cannot simply buy. Anyone who wants to play at the front in B2B in 2026 therefore treats the two platforms not separately but as one system — from first awareness through to conversion.
We treat LinkedIn and Google as one system — from first awareness through to conversion. Tell us about your funnel.























