Book a call →
name it like a boss
A company name feels like a matter of taste. In truth it is physics: measurable, predictable — and expensive if you get it wrong.
the door handle
the starting pointThere is a moment in every founding process when everyone in the room suddenly turns poet. Then comes the line: “We just need to find a name quickly.” Quickly. As though the name were the price tag rather than the product.
Yet the name is the first thing a person processes about a brand — and the last thing they forget. It runs ahead of every logo, every website and every campaign. It is the door handle before anyone enters the room. And here is the most uncomfortable truth up front: whether that handle feels good is not a question of taste. It is a question of psychology, and psychology has researched this mercilessly well.
Good news for anyone who yawns at the word “psychology”: it does not make the process less creative. It only makes it less random. Once you understand why some names stick in the mind while others slip through like water, you stop brainstorming into the void — you start aiming.
processing fluency
ease winsCognitive researchers call it processing fluency — the ease with which our brain handles a piece of information. And the brain loves ease almost embarrassingly much.
Whatever it can read, pronounce and retain effortlessly, it judges to be more trustworthy, more likeable and more valuable. Not because that would be logical, but because ease feels like familiarity, and familiarity feels like safety.
Just how far this effect reaches was shown by the Princeton psychologists Adam Alter and Daniel Oppenheimer in 2006. They studied flotations on American stock exchanges and found that shares in companies with easily pronounceable names performed measurably better in the first days of trading than those with unwieldy ones.
$1,000 invested in easily pronounceable shares returned $85.35 more after a single day of trading than the same money placed in hard-to-pronounce ones.
An effect that has nothing to do with balance sheets, cash flow or market potential and everything to do with whether a person can get the name fluently past their lips. Rational investors, playing for serious money, follow a linguistic reflex. If that is how the stock market behaves, how hard does it hit a young brand fighting for attention?
The practical consequence is unspectacular and effective for exactly that reason: short beats long. A name that fits on a coffee cup and can be spelled correctly on first hearing is already halfway there. Nobody remembers “Schuhmode Exklusivvertrieb Meier GmbH” — not out of malice but in self-defence of the working memory.
bouba and kiki
sound as meaningNames carry meaning before they mean anything at all. Sound alone triggers associations — a phenomenon research calls sound symbolism.
The most famous experiment on this is so simple you can recreate it at any kitchen table. You show two shapes: one spiky and jagged, one round and soft. Then you ask which one is called “bouba” and which one “kiki”. Across languages and cultures, the vast majority of people decide the same way: the round shape is bouba, the angular one is kiki. Ramachandran and Hubbard made the effect popular again in 2001 — Wolfgang Köhler had first described it back in 1929.
For naming, that means the sound has to match the attitude. Soft liquids and nasals like L, M and N carry warmth and a sense of the premium. Hard plosives like K, T and P signal speed, edge, energy. “Google”, with its round double O, sounds like completeness; the sharp “ck” in “Slack” sounds like efficiency and a fast click. This is not retrospective interpretation but audible brand strategy.
Before a person knows what you sell, their ear has already decided how your brand feels.
Anyone looking for a name should define the feeling first — trust, innovation, warmth, force — and only then choose the sounds that carry it. Personality is not a bonus here, it is the blueprint. “Sugar & Cinnamon” tells a different story from “Sharp Minds”, and both are allowed to be right — as long as the sound matches the truth of the brand.
recommendable & expandable
fit for daily useA name rarely lives where it was designed. It lives in other people's mouths.
Pronounceable means recommendable
In a recommendation over the phone, in the half-muttered “what were they called again?”, in a search bar that ruthlessly distinguishes between two spellings. Pronounceability is not a comfort criterion, it is sales channel number one. Consonant clusters that roll off a German tongue effortlessly become a trip hazard in other languages — “str” or “spr”, for example.
The test that gives everything away
Say the name out loud once and have someone who has never seen it spell it back to you. If the person hesitates, if the tongue snags, if that half-second of uncertainty appears — you don't have a pronunciation problem, you have a growth problem.
Hint, don't spell it out
A good name may hint at what lies behind it — it just shouldn't spell it out. “Pixel Heroes” for a design agency winks; “Web Design Müller” reads out the menu. The difference is between a name that leaves room and one that walls the brand into its first business idea.
Room to grow
Cupcakes today, catering tomorrow, a food brand the day after. “The Cake Baker” is charming but stuck in its own kitchen. “Amazon” was never a bookshop, always a promise of scale. And a name that sounds too close to the competition creates interference in memory — the brand gets mistaken for another and evaporates.
legalize it
the part creatives skipA name can be phonetically perfect, emotionally charged and as stretchy as chewing gum — if it is legally taken, it is worthless. Worse still: it becomes a cost trap.
In Germany there is no way around the German Patent and Trade Mark Office (DPMA). The detail people love to overlook: when you file, the office does not check whether similar or identical marks already exist. It only looks for obvious obstacles. A mark can therefore be registered and still be vulnerable.
After publication, a three-month opposition period runs. The owner of an older, confusingly similar mark can object — and in the worst case the freshly registered mark is cancelled again. Filing electronically costs from 290 euros and protects for ten years; small and medium-sized companies can claim a substantial subsidy through the EU SME Fund.
The expensive part is not the filing. It is skipping the search.
A free preliminary search in the DPMAregister reliably catches identical hits. It gets dangerous with similarity — phonetic, visual, conceptual — and this is exactly where a professional eye pays off, before anyone falls in love with a name. Check the domain in the same breath.
And a name never exists in its own language alone. What sounds harmless in one language can be embarrassing or simply unsellable elsewhere. Five minutes of research across several languages saves the blush later. Even the best pun deserves a second look: does everyone laugh at it — or only the meeting room where it was born?
not a label, a statement
takeawayThe best name is not a solved sudoku. It moves you, surprises you, makes you smile.
“Happy Socks” lifts the mood before you even know socks are involved. That emotion is the actual glue: names that stir feeling or curiosity activate the brain regions responsible for anchoring things in long-term memory. Emotion and strategy are not opponents — the feeling is the strategy.
Which is why every candidate has to leave the meeting room. Friends, strangers, your favourite barista: don't ask them whether they find the name attractive, ask whether they will still know it tomorrow. If someone still names the right one after the third conversation, you are holding something that will carry weight.
The sounds carry the feeling, fluency carries the trust, the search carries the risk. Take those three levels seriously and you will not find just any name but the one that lands — because it stays in the mind, rolls off the tongue and holds up in court.
Sources
- 01Alter, A. L. & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2006): “Predicting short-term stock fluctuations by using processing fluency”, PNAS, 103(24), 9369–9372.
- 02Princeton University News (2006): “Study: Stock performance tied to ease of pronouncing company's name”.
- 03Köhler, W. (1929) / Ramachandran, V. S. & Hubbard, E. M. (2001): the bouba/kiki effect, sound symbolism.
- 04DelVecchio, D. et al. (2024): “From easy to known: How fluent brand processing fosters self-brand connection”, Psychology & Marketing, 41, 754–773.
- 05Spellbrand: “The Psychology Behind Brand Names That Stick” — processing fluency, sound symbolism.
- 06German Patent and Trade Mark Office (DPMA): trade mark search, examination, registration and renewal — dpma.de.
- 07DPMA fees 2026 & EU SME Fund (EUIPO): official fees from €290 when filed electronically, three-month opposition period, ten years of protection.
a name that lands?
Sound, fluency, research — we develop names that stay in the mind, roll off the tongue and hold up in court.
