Book a call →
love brands
Some brands don't burn themselves into your awareness but into your heart. The only question is whether that is real affection — or a well-disguised hype with an expiry date.
followers, not customers
the starting pointThere are people who sleep outside a shop to be the first to buy a phone. Who defend their laptop as though a family member were at stake.
Apple, Lego, Spotify, Patagonia — these brands don't have customers, they have followers. Which raises a question marketing loves to invoke and rarely answers cleanly: is this brand love real — or just a clever piece of misdirection? The good news is that there is no need to speculate. The man who coined the term also supplied a model that answers the question with surprising precision.
loyalty beyond reason
kevin robertsKevin Roberts, for many years CEO of Saatchi & Saatchi, published the book “Lovemarks: The Future Beyond Brands” in 2004. His thesis was radical: classic brands had reached the end of their power. In a market full of interchangeable products, respect alone was no longer enough — respect had become the table stake, the basic requirement that excites nobody. What was missing was love.
Roberts coined the line that has haunted every branding discussion since: great brands create loyalty for a reason; lovemarks create loyalty beyond reason. And, perhaps the most important thought of all: lovemarks do not belong to the companies but to the people who love them. Take a brand's product away and the customer buys a substitute. Take something away from a lovemark and you have a revolt on your hands.
The neurologist Donald Calne reduced it to the shortest possible formula: reason leads to conclusions, emotion leads to action.
love and respect
the gridThe key to the question in the title sits in Roberts' love/respect axis — a grid with two dimensions. Cross the two and four fields appear, and exactly one of them is hype.
Commodities
Bottom left, with low respect and low love: interchangeable goods that differ in nothing but price.
Classic brands
Top left, with high respect but low love, is where most brands live: solid, trustworthy, well regarded — but emotionally cool.
The fad zone
Bottom right, and this is where it gets decisive: high love, low respect. This is hype. Trend products that flare up fast and burn out just as fast, because there is no foundation beneath the enthusiasm.
The lovemark
Top right, where high love meets high respect. Which turns “hype or real attachment?” from a matter of opinion into a matter of position.
Hype is love without respect. A love brand is both — and that is exactly what makes it irreplaceable rather than merely desired.
what love is made of
three ingredientsHow does a brand make the leap from respected to loved? Roberts names three ingredients, and they deliberately do not sound like anything from a controlling department: mystery, sensuality, intimacy.
Mystery
Mystery lives on big stories, myths and dreams — think of tight-lipped product reveals that keep an entire industry holding its breath.
Sensuality
Sensuality speaks to the senses directly: an iconic design, an unmistakable sound, packaging you want to touch.
Intimacy
Intimacy grows out of empathy, commitment and the small, perfect gesture that turns a buyer into a confidant. Together the three produce something no focus group can plan.
And underneath it all: identity
People define themselves through their brands. Buy a product and you buy a piece of identity with it — “I'm that kind of person”. Which is why love brands never sell the object but the feeling: not trainers but a stance; not building blocks but boundless creativity. The product is only the carrier.
and the critics?
the counterargumentThere are dissenting voices, of course, and they deserve to be taken seriously. The brand expert Hans-Christian Schwingen, for one, regards the emotional charge as above all one thing: the result of sophisticated marketing. And the question stings: if a better, cheaper, faster product turned up tomorrow — wouldn't the hardcore fans secretly glance across?
The honest answer is: partly. And that is exactly where the axis model earns its keep. A brand betting on love without respect — the classic hype — loses its fans the moment the next shiny object appears. A real lovemark, by contrast, can hold itself somewhat apart from the competition. Its followers forgive mistakes, pay more and defend the brand unprompted. Love does not make them blind — but it does make them resilient.
the longing behind it
takeawayWhether you celebrate the phenomenon or eye it sceptically, one thing is beyond dispute: people long for emotion, for belonging, for a little shine in their world of consumption.
In a digitalised world where much of it feels remote, brands give back a sense of home. Roberts himself put it this way: people could no longer stand the advertising slogans — they wanted experiences instead of data, secrets instead of facts.
What is striking is that love brands are making a comeback right now — smarter than in the 2000s, digitally focused, community-driven. This time it is not about high gloss and expensive campaigns but about authenticity, real dialogue and attitude. Brands like Patagonia or Oatly show how it works: they stand for something — and therefore against something too. Try to appeal to everyone and you end up appealing to no one.
The answer to the question in the title is neither “just hype” nor “pure love” but a question of position. A real love brand does not come out of a clever campaign but out of consistent work over years — out of respect you earn and love you cannot buy, only make possible. Because a brand you merely respect, you replace. One you love, you defend.
Sources
- 01Roberts, K. (2004): “Lovemarks: The Future Beyond Brands”, powerHouse Books — the origin of the love brand concept.
- 02Kevin Roberts / Saatchi & Saatchi: “Love/Respect Axis” — four fields: commodities, fads (hype), brands, lovemarks.
- 03Kevin Roberts: “Loyalty Beyond Reason” — mystery, sensuality and intimacy as the building blocks of brand love.
- 04Kevin Duncan / dictionary entry “Lovemark”: loyalty beyond reason requires the highest love and the highest respect.
- 05Donald Calne (quoted in K. Roberts): “Reason leads to conclusions, emotion leads to action” — emotion as the driver of behaviour.
- 06Hans-Christian Schwingen: a critical reading of emotional brand charge as a marketing effect.
- 07Hilker Consulting (2025): “Love Brands — Beliebte Marken in Social Media”: the comeback of love brands, digital and community-focused.
a brand worth defending?
Respect is earned; love can only be made possible. We build brands so that they are not just noticed but felt.
